Software Testing in Network Approach

Return to site

Software Testing in Network Approach

But, you may not have heard of network testing. With a fully managed network testing approach, the vendor is fully responsible for choosing the right team, coordinate their efforts, and managing the end of the test cycle to end. Meanwhile, shares of partnership co-managed network testing responsibilities: writing client test cases, inviting testers, assign test cases, run the test, and monitor test results. This approach is preferred by organizations that want to share the testing process and test each time based on immediate needs. In the end, the client discovered that the network testing approach (either fully managed or co-managed) produces a higher quality of test coverage and problem reporting, while testing it for rewarding work and a fair wage.

Also read : software testing Company in UAE

Bring a freelance individual testers needed

While fully managed testing vendor base, it has the potential to get out of the budget for enterprise, small early stage. But the need for a real device testing remains. A QA manager can hire testers contract to help. Finding skilled testers in LinkedIn or oDesk who has a testimonial or review is likely to prove more beneficial than relying on crowdsourced testing site.

You better forging individual relationships because then you can set a fair compensation per hour. Because crowdsourced sites usually pay per bug, they attract highly experienced testers and the results are often not worth the cost savings.
 
Split the device between employees

If you have a large library of devices in the office, you can divide them among your team. Employees working remotely can take a percentage of the hardware for home testing if your organization is still encouraging remote working.
 
While this sounds like a fun strategy, it is usually time-expensive. Your QA team may lean and focus on test strategies, management, and automation. You may not hire testers users enough to cover the device.
 
Time is not the only problem with this strategy. Team in your home knows how mobile apps or sites must operate, and will not come it with fresh eyes. It was also challenging to handle localization testing and the scope of the device when testing with this method.

Also read: software testing company in India

Use a device ranch

Another option is to use a device ranch, which simulates real devices, such as AWS Device Agriculture. By breeding device, you can choose devices based on the make, model, and OS version. You will then see the device in your web browser, and you can interact with it as you would test the manual exploration. You can gesture, swipe, and tap the device, assuming you use a touchscreen computer.
 
Although laboratory digital device that provides online access easy, simple cleaning methods they use to present the test device and the centralized location does not match the real-world environment.
 
What you see is the size and responsiveness of the device's screen, but you do not really experience the OS and other physical elements such as batteries, storage devices, and connectivity.

Nothing can be compared with the tens of hundreds of combinations of device / OS using real hardware in the hands of a skilled examiner. Not only do you get a response to the device, but also how real users interact with the device, with a myriad of other real-world factors play.

That is why most engineering and quality teams chose to partner with experienced testers that can provide real device coverage.